Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 20th August 2010, 02:03 PM
Dale C Dale C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 8
Default

Hi Lloyd,

any idea which way VA/DJ are leaning re 763/330? I understand some new build 763s may be available by Feb 2011, but 330s will have to be leased, and ex EK 332s look to be 1 likely source.
Are they looking at these planes predominately for domestic or regional expansion? If regional, then the 330 would be the more likely choice IMO, but if their main use will be to up capacity on domestic trunk sectors, then I think the 763s could be favourite.
I have also actually heard that 333s could also be considered. From where, I don't know?

Dale.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 20th August 2010, 04:05 PM
lloyd fox lloyd fox is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,141
Default

To be honest i dont know Dale, however JB did work with QF and there were problems turning 332's around quickly at domestic terminals-he would be aware of that .Secondly,i read on another site that he just made a brief trip to the States the week before last, so mayby new 763's .Time will tell i guess.

I believe both domestically and regionally, and yes 330's would be better suited to Asia.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 23rd August 2010, 01:26 AM
Jarden S Jarden S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 735
Default

Virgin Blue are increasing Perth to Phuket from 2 per week to 3 per week and MEL-DPS goes up to daily.

http://www.travelweekly.com.au/dirpl...16_08_2010.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 24th August 2010, 08:19 AM
Dale C Dale C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 8
Default

Of course DJ have an easy answer if they want to incrementally increase aircraft size on trunk domestic routes................they can order some 739ERs.
These can be converted from existing 738 orders and may be the simplest approach to increasing capacity. Obviously, regional flying would require a plane with significantly more range. I wonder if DJ will enlighten us next week when they celebrate their 10th anniversary?

Dale.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 24th August 2010, 09:18 PM
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarden S View Post
Yes it seems a waste to leave the 777 at LAX from 0800 to 2120 every day of the week.
Yet Qantas do this (well very similar hours) every single day with several 747's!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 25th August 2010, 07:08 AM
Skip Fulton Skip Fulton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 34
Default

Yes, LAX is a key B747 maintenance base for QF, and the primary maintenance base for VA.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement