|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Qantas flight forced to turn back due to engine problem
Quote:
Another Qantas drama involving their 747s. Is it really maintenance issue or their 747s are just too old. If these sort of issues continue to happen, it is not only going to affect their reliability but also damper the public image of Qantas aircrafts. Why hasn't QF consider leasing some 777s rather than waiting for the arrival of their 380s and 787s? Obviously with the current feet they got, only the 747s can make the distance and this could potentially harm them if the 747s continue to behave like this. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Ryan
CX, UA, LH, TG, BA, CI, DL and others all operate B747-400 low msn number from early 90s so QF is not alone here. I see your point QF do not have an alternate one compare to other carriers. Can't comment the other stuff though.....
__________________
SamChuiPhotos.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
But were there flames coming from the engine?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Aircraft was VH-OJF, the one that it meant to be retiring very soon. VH-OJN was flown in as a replacement
__________________
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your head turned skywards; for there you have been and there you long to return" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The media are having a bit of a feeding frenzy with Qantas at the moment. Even the mildest delay is being portrayed as a "safety threat".
This is not a first however. Most will remember the multiple attacks made on Ansett in its final years for incredibly minor issues. The media cannot be bothered explaining the safety first mentality that pervades aviation so then assumes that any minor issue is a major safety threat when in relaity it is the airlines enforcing their and the regulator's policies that any minor item deserves immediate attention even if it causes delays etc. The media is a bit each-way here. What would they say if airlines ignored minor safety defects and continued on.
__________________
Brad |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Brad one of the reasons the media is having a feeding frenzy is simply because the maintenance union is in dispute with Qantas again. Wonder who is feeding them their 'stories'? It is funny how when there is a union dispute that all these issues come to the surface.
Disclaimer. Clearly this issue and the A380 issue last week would have made it anyway, but not the multitude of day to day issues mentioned in the article quoted. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
With regards to the mainstream 'tabloid' media - Whatever it took to sell more copies or attract more viewers.
__________________
Things ain't what they used to be! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Didn't CASA have an issue with another Australian airline at Easter about 9 years back?
Those issues, I seem to remember didn't work out too well for the airline concerned. The media last week were reporting that CASA are having a bit of a closer look at QANTAS, but have not yet issued a show cause order regarding B747-400 ops. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Don't bite the hand that feeds you
Unions need to be careful not to put Qantas profitability in jeopardy to further their cause. They may have legitimate grievances but the travelling public are easily scared off and Qantas staff will suffer before Qantas shareholders.
__________________
Philip |
|
|