Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22nd August 2015, 01:40 PM
Greg Hyde Greg Hyde is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,471
Default QF - The Next Generation

Now with QF confirming B787 orders. what's next ?


The oldest B717 (NXI) first flew in 1999 whist the oldest F100 (NHO) first flew in 1990.

The pure economics of operating these aircraft as well as the need for business class class seats will see the replacement of these aircraft. Probably sooner than later.

How to replace the QLink regional jets ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22nd August 2015, 05:26 PM
Michael R Michael R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 99
Default

Was talking about this very thing on the ramp the other night Greg whilst I was working on another 717 in Sydney. Qantas did look at the Bombardier CS100 apparently for our Qlink operations on the East Coast but word is that they are happy to hold onto the 717 until at least 2019. But like anything I guess could change.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22nd August 2015, 07:35 PM
MarkR MarkR is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,075
Default

I would imagine quite a few operators are looking at similar plans, such as HA etc, economics are much tighter when you have to buy a new plane vs getting someone else's reject for cheap.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23rd August 2015, 07:41 AM
Max C Max C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 676
Default

The extra 717's are just a cheap quick fix to add capacity.

Seeing as they are the last 2 717's left in the world for lease.

No doubt something will replace them. Think the C Series or the new Embraer E-Jet as probably the front runners.

The F100's on the otherhand will probably stay in WA for a while as their cheap aquisition cost suits the low utilisation flying for the FIFO markets in WA.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23rd August 2015, 01:27 PM
Greg Hyde Greg Hyde is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,471
Default

The long term solution will be driven by economics.

Ie

* Running costs (AirNZ saves 20% fuel where B787 vs B777 on same run)
* Serviceability (Looking at QFSouce a B717 goes u/s on average once a week)
* Bums on Seats (loosing highly profitable business class to rivals)

I would say that most B717 long term operators are facing the same problem. eg: Delta
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd August 2015, 03:11 PM
Max C Max C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 676
Default

B717 u/s is closer to 4-5 days a week at the moment.

Especially on the East Coast.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23rd August 2015, 03:25 PM
Dave Dale Dave Dale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 360
Default

I think this was talked about when Qantas went to Seattle for Boeing catch up in 2013. I recall seeing their deliberations in an investor update. However, failing my finding that particular update, this article might address some of your queries.

http://www.flightglobal.com/news/art...ptions-391482/

In short, mentions as potential 717 replacements:

737-7 MAX
A319neo
C Series
Embraer

Last edited by Dave Dale; 23rd August 2015 at 03:26 PM. Reason: add year
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23rd August 2015, 04:16 PM
MarkR MarkR is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,075
Default

Good update on the market for the 100+ seat market here although it is approaching a year old:

http://leehamnews.com/2014/10/12/***...9-seat-sector/

Last edited by MarkR; 23rd August 2015 at 04:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 24th August 2015, 11:23 PM
Christopher Campbell's Avatar
Christopher Campbell Christopher Campbell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 315
Default

As for A330-300 replacement aircraft the 787-10 would be best fit for most Asia/Oceania destinations. An all Boeing international fleet which looks like where it's heading in the medium to long term will help decrease maintence costs I would think would be perfect for commonality.

B777-9/8X, A380 replacement (A380neo possible if it is available by then, but unlikely) A380 replacement from 2023-2025

B787-9, B747 replacement and growth in US, Dubai, Europe

B787-9/10, A330-300 replacement from 2021-2023 approx and future growth in Asia/Oceania

What will be the A330-200 replacement aircraft though? B787-8?

Also for the B737-800 replacement aircraft?

Does Qantas transfer the some a320neo orders to replace B737-8 but then have to retrain Qantas short haul pilots but then decrease maintence costs and other benefits by having Qantas and Jetstar both using A320neos. Or does Qantas order B737MAX and A320neo for Jetstar and not have to retrain. I think having QF and JQ having both A320neos is the best option in the long term.

Are the Qantas Groups A320neo order delivery from FY17 too FY22?

Last edited by Christopher Campbell; 25th August 2015 at 07:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27th August 2015, 09:19 PM
Tom Cleary Tom Cleary is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 7
Default

I think 2023-2025 is too early to be replacing the A380's, considering the youngest one would only be 14 years old. And you never know they might exercise those 8 postponed orders to replace the older A380's and 744ERS.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement