Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 27th September 2008, 10:38 AM
Stephen Brown Stephen Brown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Raymond Terrace/Williamtown
Posts: 555
Default

Nigel, Nothing stacks up against the Caribou for short field performance...
__________________
My Jetphotos Click Clicks

Whens the BBQ in Brisvegas Muzzdog??

Soon..
No where. Where should I go?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 27th September 2008, 10:39 AM
Nathan Long Nathan Long is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YMML
Posts: 263
Default

The Buffalo would come close...
__________________
My JetPhotos photos
All Australia Canada NZ UK
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 27th September 2008, 11:14 AM
Andrew McLaughlin's Avatar
Andrew McLaughlin Andrew McLaughlin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Brown View Post
Nigel, Nothing stacks up against the Caribou for short field performance...
...unless you put a decent load on it. The Caribou has great field performance, but only with a few troops and maybe a Land Rover on board. Put anymore on it and it very quickly comes back to the field.
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 27th September 2008, 11:19 AM
Grant Smith Grant Smith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere between YSSY & LLBG - God's Country
Posts: 774
Default

Stick with the MD-11... Now that is crime performunze!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 27th September 2008, 11:47 AM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Hmmm...MD-11 for the Army...I like it!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 27th September 2008, 11:51 AM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Long View Post
The Buffalo would come close...

Is that the Brewster Buffalo? I thought it was a bit outdated and a little underpowered for current operational needs, but if that's what floats your boat.........


The Finnish variety!



And one in action!

Last edited by Nigel C; 27th September 2008 at 12:27 PM. Reason: The original picture I used keeps dropping off the page , so I had to find another one!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 27th September 2008, 12:24 PM
Raymond Rowe's Avatar
Raymond Rowe Raymond Rowe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 537
Default

But the Buffalo like's to collapse its wings.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 27th September 2008, 12:25 PM
Bob C Bob C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 687
Default

Hi Nathan

I've often thought that the DH Buffalo may have been a natural follow on to the Caribou but I don't think it was anywhere near as successful as the 'bou which is odd given DH Canada's success with other models.

And somehow I can't picture a C27J getting banged down on rough strips like the Caribou. The C27 looks too pretty to be treated that way !!

Time will tell.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 27th September 2008, 12:43 PM
damien b damien b is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Default

The DHC-5 Buffalo (A Caribou with turbo props and a weather radar) wasn't as succesful as the US Army didn't buy any, unlike the Caribou which it brought for service in Vietnam. It didn't have quite the same STOL perormance as the Caribou, although it was still pretty good.

The Caribou could take a load of 26 troops or a land rover which was basically its full load into a airstrip at 800ft in length on memory, depending on the airfields altitude.

I recall on several ocassions whilst 38 SQN was based at Richmond watching Caribous struggle on circuits due to the head winds and requiring extra pwoer to get the aircraft down. On more than one occasion the aircraft had negative airspeed.

These days the Chinnok would perform the roles that the Caribou can do, the C-27 if brought, would slot into another role between the Chinook and the C-130 fleet roles.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 27th September 2008, 04:42 PM
Alec Goldfinch Alec Goldfinch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Default

Ok whack on the same engines as the Dash 8 and the Bou would be just as good, and don't the airframes on the Caribou have an infinite lifespan??
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement