Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > International Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd October 2009, 11:53 AM
Trevor Sinclair's Avatar
Trevor Sinclair Trevor Sinclair is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Inner West
Posts: 105
Default More than missed approach, missed airport!

An interesting one here from this morning's Tele.
http://www.news.com.au/travel/story/...014090,00.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23rd October 2009, 12:38 PM
Mark T Mark T is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Approx 4nm NW of YSSY
Posts: 273
Default Not to mention the missed runway

And this one from Delta:

http://www.jetphotos.net/news/index....&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24th October 2009, 12:58 AM
Blair M Blair M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 39
Default

It's beyond me to a certain extent that in this modern age we continue to have such major 'incidents'. Especially with modern airlines that have rigorous crew competency training mechanisms and organisational factors in place. Let alone the heavy regulation from the FAA/CASA etc.

Without pre-empting the investigations, it would seem obvious fatigue was a key driver in both instances. I think this will become the biggest killer moving forward in the industry. The aircraft are getting safer, technology can do a lot, but it can’t wake you up when you’re tired. The recent EK A345 incident was another example. I’m sure there are many more.

The 767 taxiway incident reminded me of the SQ 744 accident in TPE.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24th October 2009, 01:05 AM
Blair M Blair M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 39
Default

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N...135Z/KSAN/KMSP

Hmm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24th October 2009, 05:20 AM
Grahame Hutchison's Avatar
Grahame Hutchison Grahame Hutchison is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney's Eastern Suburbs - View From Bondi To Jibbon Point And Bravo 10 South
Posts: 8,533
Default

Nice little track on Flightaware, they should send the pilots the fuel bill.
__________________
Joined 1999 @www16Right FlightDiary Airliners Web QR Retired PPL C150/172 PA28-161/181 Pitts S-2B SIM: 12Hr QF B767 B744 CX B742 Nikon D100-D200-D300-D500
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24th October 2009, 07:03 AM
Gareth Forwood Gareth Forwood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blair M View Post
...technology can do a lot, but it can’t wake you up when you’re tired.
Actually now it can - the 2010 Mercedes E Class will have a system in place that wakes you if it senses you begin to doze off - http://reviews.carreview.com/blog/ne...rs-to-wake-up/. However the financial cost of adding that to a fleet of aircraft would be ridiculously high...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24th October 2009, 04:43 PM
Mick F Mick F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 852
Default

As Blair says, technology is becoming greater in the modern cockpit. The amount of information available now through the complex avionics now contained in not only airliners, but even new GA aircraft (right down to small recreational aircraft) is phenomonal.

However...... One of the things in aviation that can never be changed (at least in the modern era), only minimised to an extent, is human factors. Whilst ever you have a human in control of an aircraft, be it in maintenance or in the cockpit, or even behind the console at air traffic control, you will always have the risk of something going wrong.

Human factors is the biggest contributor towards aircraft accidents and incidents.

Probably more so in the last 10-20 years than any other time, there has been a very big focus on this area of aviation. Crew Resource Management, Fatigue Management, Safety Management Systems (which covers basically everything) are a normal part of modern airlines and general aviation operators these days. There are extensive studies constantly being undertaken on human factors, with some interesting results that can assist us with learning more about not only human factors as a whole, but also ourselves in everything we do.

Mick
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25th October 2009, 08:36 PM
Chris Griffiths Chris Griffiths is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gareth Forwood View Post
However the financial cost of adding that to a fleet of aircraft would be ridiculously high...
Would it be that expensive, a manufacturer like Mercedes putting this capability in a car such as an E Class, the cost would likely be less than a couple of hundred dollars per vehicle.

For Delta/NW with approx 450 aircraft that would amount to $90,000.
OK certifying and installing something in a commercial airliner is not going to happen for $200/unit.
Adding price escalation for certification and aerospace supplier price gouging and say $10,000/unit. 450 aircraft is going to run something like $4,500,000 hardly a showstopper if shown to be of real benefit.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25th October 2009, 09:36 PM
Adam G Adam G is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 170
Default

Some aircraft have systems in place that essentially alarm if the crew don't touch specific things in the flight deck for a specified amount of time - in the B777 for example it occurs after 20 minutes.

There are also procedures in most airlines for cabin crew to contact flight crew every 20 or so minutes to ensure they are still awake/alive.

Given pilots and cabin crew would normally at minimum have a interphone discussion (but normally a face to face contact) around the TOD point it's strange they over flew whether due sleep or "heated discussion" by so far.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26th October 2009, 07:27 AM
Gareth Forwood Gareth Forwood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 372
Default

The whole thing reminds me of this thread all over again... Pilots fall asleep due to early start, sleep disorder
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement