Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 31st May 2008, 06:30 PM
Grant Smith Grant Smith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere between YSSY & LLBG - God's Country
Posts: 774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip Argy View Post
You wouldn't leave someone stuck in a lift that long without calling the rescue squad!
Have you ever been stuck in a lift before? I haven't either, but I've been involved in the retrieval of people being stuck in lifts and I've had people stuck in there for 2 hours before the lift operators arrived.

Not much Police, Ambulance or Fire rescue teams can do without the lift operators being there... Especially if there's no immediate endangerment...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31st May 2008, 06:32 PM
Chris Tully Chris Tully is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 92
Default

For every dollar the price of fuel increase, it wipes approx 35 million dollars from Qantas' bottom line...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 1st June 2008, 12:22 AM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,402
Default Could be worse ...

Lawyer sues airline for ruining family vacation

A New York lawyer is suing Delta Air Lines for $US1 million, saying his family vacation turned into a nightmare after they were stranded in an airport for days and treated disdainfully by airline employees.
Richard Roth, who filed the lawsuit on behalf of himself and his mother, said he planned the Christmas 2007 trip to Buenos Aires to celebrate his mother's 80th birthday.
She had grown up in the city, but had not returned in years, he said.
Instead, Mr Roth, his two teenage children, his wife and mother spent three days in airports, went days without their luggage, were treated rudely by airline employees and were forced to spend $US21,000 on unused hotel rooms in Argentina, replacement clothes, and other costs.
"Through its gross negligence, malfeasance and absolute incompetence, Mr Roth holds Delta responsible for ruining his vacation," the lawsuit said, filed in New York state court.
Delta Air Lines had no immediate comment.
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19th June 2008, 08:48 AM
Montague S's Avatar
Montague S Montague S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 957
Default

http://www.watoday.com.au/national/s...0619-2t2o.html

no probs, just offer strike breakers $100,000 for 6 months work... me thinks someone has their head buried in the *** end of a 747 APU at QF HQ.

Quote:
Strike will disrupt Qantas flights

* Ben Schneiders
* June 18, 2008

Qantas passengers will suffer flight cancellations and severe disruptions from Monday as the airline's licensed engineers begin an indefinite campaign of rolling strikes as part of a pay dispute.

Members of the Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association will walk off the job on Monday in Melbourne, Sydney and Cairns for at least four hours at each airport.

On Tuesday there will be strikes in Perth, Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane. The strikes will then continue.

The action comes at a difficult time for Qantas, with the airline warning recently that its soaring fuel bill would prompt it to cut routes and hundreds of jobs, freeze executive pay and ground aircraft.

Late last month the union held three stopwork meetings, which grounded flights and caused delays for passengers. But the latest move has raised the stakes sharply in the dispute.

Qantas's head of people, Kevin Brown, said last night that there would be disruptions and cancellations after the union decision to escalate the dispute.

"We expect to fly the majority of our network and get people to their destinations on the day they chose to fly. [But] there will be delays and disruptions to customers due to the escalations in the bans and the strikes the [engineers] have imposed on us."

The national secretary of the union, Steve Purvinas, warned that the stoppages would continue until Qantas returned to the negotiating table.

"These stoppages will go on as long as Geoff Dixon denies his staff members a reasonable wage."

Qantas told the association this week that it did not intend to change its 3 per cent wage offer in response to the union demand for a 5 per cent rise. That followed meetings involving the airline, the union and the ACTU.

The union fears Qantas will move in strike-breakers as the dispute escalates.

Last month it was revealed Qantas was offering, through a labour hire firm, strike-breakers $100,000 for six months' work as aircraft engineers.
__________________
photos updated 29 Sept

Next Flights:
MEL-HKG-HND-HKG-JFK-HKG-NRT-HKG-MEL/CX
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 19th June 2008, 09:57 AM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

Quote:
"These stoppages will go on as long as Geoff Dixon denies his staff members a reasonable wage."
So, what do they consider a 'reasonable wage'?

And what is the typical LAME at Qantas already on? I understand that there are different LAMEs specialising in different areas (avionics, structural etc), therefore probably quite a wide spread pay scale.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 19th June 2008, 10:13 AM
Montague S's Avatar
Montague S Montague S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel C View Post
So, what do they consider a 'reasonable wage'?

And what is the typical LAME at Qantas already on? I understand that there are different LAMEs specialising in different areas (avionics, structural etc), therefore probably quite a wide spread pay scale.
CPI adjusted is my guess...if they can afford $100,000 for however many engineers they plan on hiring for 6 months then surely they can afford a 2% pay increase for their current engineers?
__________________
photos updated 29 Sept

Next Flights:
MEL-HKG-HND-HKG-JFK-HKG-NRT-HKG-MEL/CX
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 19th June 2008, 11:25 AM
Nigel C Nigel C is offline
Prolific Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The farm
Posts: 4,022
Default

That sounds more like you're saying a reasonable 'increase', not wage.

I thought they were going for a 5% increase?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 19th June 2008, 02:12 PM
Montague S's Avatar
Montague S Montague S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel C View Post
That sounds more like you're saying a reasonable 'increase', not wage.

I thought they were going for a 5% increase?
the current negotiations are stalled at 3% & engineers want 2% on top of that...
__________________
photos updated 29 Sept

Next Flights:
MEL-HKG-HND-HKG-JFK-HKG-NRT-HKG-MEL/CX
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 19th June 2008, 02:36 PM
Brenden S Brenden S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,069
Default

Last I heard that the engineers were happy for 3% but wanted some other conditions to make up the other 2% however Mr Dixon in all his wisdom said no. The LAME is Avionics and Mechanical split like this
Mechanical: Airframe and/or Engines
Avionics: Radio and/or Electrical and/or Instrument

Then on top of that you have the different pay levels from Level 1 to level 12 I think off memory, as well as Leading hand and Supervisor extra's. I can see what will happen is that Mr Dixon will say yes we will meet with you on monday if you call off the strike to save his bacon and still get no where. I am looking forward to the delays on Tuesday and Wednesday.....NOT.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement