Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > International Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 6th September 2010, 01:39 PM
Greg McDonald Greg McDonald is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 723
Default Co-pilots are unnecessary - Ryanair's Michael O'Leary says

Hope this was tongue-in-cheek...


Quote:
A CONTROVERSIAL airline chief has been accused of endangering passengers' safety after calling for co-pilots to be replaced with flight attendants.
Michael O’Leary, head of budget airline Ryanair, suggested that money could be saved by abolishing co-pilots.

Mr O’Leary said that a flight attendant could be trained to land the plane if the pilot ran into problems.

"Really, you only need one pilot. Let's take out the second pilot. Let the bl**dy computer fly it," Mr O’Leary told Bloomberg Business Week.

"If the pilot has an emergency, he rings the bell, he calls her in, she could take over."

However, pilots are angered at his comments, saying the move would put passengers’ lives at risk.

“His suggestion is unwise, unsafe and the public will be horrified," a spokesman for the British Airline Pilots’ Association told the UK’s Sky News.

Mr O’Leary has found himself in hot water before over his suggestions to reduce the number of toilets onboard aircraft and make them coin operated.

He also announced plans for stand-up seating on planes.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 6th September 2010, 04:23 PM
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Default

Much like paying to use the toilets me thinks!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6th September 2010, 04:40 PM
Hugh Jarse Hugh Jarse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 217
Wink

Mr. O'Leary, your village is calling!!

He doesn't offer a quality product, therefore has to resort to sensationalist comments to the media in order to promote his airline (and they fall for it like the suckers they are)

Personally, I think he does more harm than good to his company spewing forth tripe like that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th September 2010, 05:30 PM
Anthony T Anthony T is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Stalybridge Station Buffet
Posts: 321
Default

Hi there

You need 2 on the flight deck - 1 Pilot and 1 Dog
The pilot is there to feed the dog and the dog is there to bite the pilot if he touches the controls.

Maybe MOL has a point, but you need two people on the flightdeck at all times. Maybe a 737 rated pilot and someone like a basic CPL to operate the radio's and double check the pilots actions call out the checklists etc, it would certainly be cheaper I would think.

Cheers
Anthony
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 6th September 2010, 09:13 PM
James Smith James Smith is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cherrybrook NSW
Posts: 1,363
Wink

Sorry, but the flight attendant couldn't get through the locked cockpit door or she was down the aisle and couldn't get around the trolleys. Sounds like Basil Faulty. Why not promote the blow up pilot from Flying High to take over the role. That should keep everyone happy with two pilots! Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 7th September 2010, 07:25 AM
David Ramsay David Ramsay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auckland
Posts: 405
Default

The dog doesn't work on its own, you also need a cat and a duck ...

Quote:
THE CAT & DUCK METHOD OF FLYING

Today's flight age is an era highlighted with increasing emphasis on safety. Instrumentation in the cockpit and in the traffic control tower has reached new peaks of electronic perfection to assist the pilot during take-offs, flight, and landings. For whimsical contrast to these and other marvels of scientific flight engineering, it is perhaps opportune to remind pilots of the basic rules concerning the so-called Cat-and-Duck Method of Flight, just in case something goes wrong with any of these new-fangled flying instruments you find in today's aircraft.

Place a live cat on the cockpit floor. Because a cat always remains upright, he or she can be used in lieu of a needle and ball. Merely watch to see which way the cat leans to determine if a wing is low and, if so, which one.

The duck is used for the instrument approach and landing. Because any sensible duck will refuse to fly under instrument conditions, it is only necessary to hurl your duck out of the plane and follow her to the ground.

There are some limitations to the Cat-and-Duck Method, but by rigidly adhering to the following check list, a degree of success will be achieved.

Get a wide-awake cat. Most cats do not want to stand up at all, at any time. It may be necessary to get a large fierce dog in the cockpit to keep the cat at attention.

Make sure your cat is clean. Dirty cats will spend all their time washing. Trying to follow a cat licking itself usually results in a tight snap roll, followed by an inverted (or flat) spin. You can see this is very unsanitary.

Old cats are best. Young cats have nine lives, but an old used-up cat with only one life left has just as much to lose an you do and will therefore be more dependable.

Beware of cowardly ducks. If the duck discovers that you are using the cat to stay upright - or straight and level- she will refuse to leave without the cat. Ducks are no better on instruments than you are.

Be sure the duck has good eyesight. Nearsighted ducks sometimes will go flogging off into the nearest hill. Very short-sighted ducks will not realize they have been thrown out and will descend to the ground in a sitting position. This maneuver is quite difficult to follow in an airplane.
Use land-loving ducks. It is very discouraging to break out and find yourself on final approach for some farm pound in Iowa. Also, the farmers there suffer from temporary insanity when chasing crows off their corn fields and will shoot anything that flies.

Choose your duck carefully. It is easy to confuse ducks with geese because many water birds look alike. While they are very competent instrument flyers , geese seldom want to go in the same direction you do. If your duck heads off for the Okefenokee Swamp, you may be sure you have been given the goose.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 7th September 2010, 01:12 PM
Donald H Donald H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony T View Post
Hi there

You need 2 on the flight deck - 1 Pilot and 1 Dog
The pilot is there to feed the dog and the dog is there to bite the pilot if he touches the controls.

Maybe MOL has a point, but you need two people on the flightdeck at all times. Maybe a 737 rated pilot and someone like a basic CPL to operate the radio's and double check the pilots actions call out the checklists etc, it would certainly be cheaper I would think.

Cheers
Anthony
Yeah, so we lose a few hundred people once in a while...who cares? As long as the fare is cheap, right?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 7th September 2010, 07:09 PM
Joe Frampton Joe Frampton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 120
Default Booze

The man is undoubtedly a complete tool, but a very rich tool, and a tool who runs the largest airline in the world in terms of international passenger numbers. So we can all be out outraged at his outlandish comments, in scant regard of all safety conventions, but millions & millions of people will still put up with pretty much anything to fly for a dollar, and I suppose I'm one of them. I watch with keen interest
__________________

Next Trips:
Feb BNE-CBR-BNE, QF
18May BNE-DPS-KUL-PEN-SIN-BNE, VA/AirAsia/QF
05Oct BNE-YVR-PDX-YVR-BNE, AC
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 8th September 2010, 12:58 PM
Craig Sandford Craig Sandford is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London
Posts: 35
Default

Makes you wonder what other forms of redundancy he will suggest aren't required.
__________________
Craig Sandford
Total Flying in the back seat:
Miles: 651,193; Hours: 1,484:43; Flights: 526; Routes; 218; Airports: 101; Airlines: 47; Countries:27
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 8th September 2010, 09:56 PM
D Chan D Chan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 463
Default

couldve got the pax to fly the plane as well
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement