Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41  
Old 22nd April 2009, 04:44 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

I'd hate to see the fuel bill for a low altitude depressurized ferry from Australia to France!

I'm surprised the pilots didn't detect that they weren't approaching Vr speed in the required time and perform a RTO. Would a pilot know their aircraft wasn't accelerating appropriately and know something was wrong? After using up two thirds of YMML's runway and still not being anywhere near the required speed would ring alarm bells for a pilot wouldn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 22nd April 2009, 05:33 PM
Owen H Owen H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 365
Default

Its a tough one! He would notice at some point, but by the time he does it might be too late to do anything other than continue anyway.

Values like V1 have no meaning when they are calculated for the incorrect weight/thrust.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 23rd April 2009, 08:12 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

Maybe they should just "junk it". (I'm joking in case anyone takes exception)

I'm sure EK would prefer to take the insurance on a 345 and move on. (Not joking)
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 23rd April 2009, 10:53 AM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

I understand that after V1 the only decision is to go, but what happens in an instance like this when there isn't enough thrust to get off the ground in time?

Also, even though the FMC selected the incorrect thrust due to incorrect weight input, can the pilot apply any more thrust manually by pushing the thrust levers further forward? Or is full thrust (i.e. levers fully forward) the de-rated selection as made by the FMC?

I hope that made sense !
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 23rd April 2009, 12:24 PM
Andrew McLaughlin's Avatar
Andrew McLaughlin Andrew McLaughlin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickN View Post
I understand that after V1 the only decision is to go, but what happens in an instance like this when there isn't enough thrust to get off the ground in time?
What happens is what happened in Melbourne....or much worse!

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickN
Also, even though the FMC selected the incorrect thrust due to incorrect weight input, can the pilot apply any more thrust manually by pushing the thrust levers further forward? Or is full thrust (i.e. levers fully forward) the de-rated selection as made by the FMC?
The pilots can override by hitting the TOGA switch.
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 23rd April 2009, 01:23 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Would they not have had the sense to take advantage of the TOGA switch when their backside was scraping the paint at the end of the runway?

Given the fact they only just cleared a 2.7m fence half a kilometre from the end of the runway it appears as if no further action was taken. I would have been hittin' that switch like a madman to get off the ground quickly!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 23rd April 2009, 02:39 PM
Owen H Owen H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 365
Default

Theoretically a pilot would hit the switch and push the thrust levers fully forward to get maximum thrust.

That said, there are enough similar incidents that have shown the pilots are too busy just trying to keep the aircraft upright than to think of hitting TOGA.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 23rd April 2009, 02:43 PM
NickN NickN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,394
Default

Thats true Owen, I suppose so much is happening during takeoff that sometimes the most simple things get overlooked.

Out of curiosity, what procedures are in place for checking and then re-checking the weights and inputs into the FMC to avoid incidents where incorrect weights affect thrust settings? I would have assumed there was a system for checking everything before actually flying.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 23rd April 2009, 02:52 PM
Chris Griffiths Chris Griffiths is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickN View Post
Would they not have had the sense to take advantage of the TOGA switch when their backside was scraping the paint at the end of the runway?

Given the fact they only just cleared a 2.7m fence half a kilometre from the end of the runway it appears as if no further action was taken. I would have been hittin' that switch like a madman to get off the ground quickly!
It is only a TOGA button, not a miracle anti gravity device, you cannot instantly transform a couple of hundred tons of lumbering truck into a rocket ship. You need to be aware enough of your situation to press it and take other action soon enough, it appears for whatever reason this crew were not in that position.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 23rd April 2009, 03:00 PM
Ken K Ken K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NickN View Post
I'm surprised the pilots didn't detect that they weren't approaching Vr speed in the required time and perform a RTO. Would a pilot know their aircraft wasn't accelerating appropriately and know something was wrong? After using up two thirds of YMML's runway and still not being anywhere near the required speed would ring alarm bells for a pilot wouldn't it?
What Owen said about V1 going out of the window when calculated for incorrect thrust is correct. Taking an inadequate thrust example, as V1 would occur at a point further down the runway, you can neither guarantee there is enough runway to stop in the runway remaining in a stop scenario from V1, nor that continuing from V1 with engine out will result in attaining a height of 35ft by the end of the runway.

Bear in mind too that in the high-speed portion of the takeoff (above 100kt for the A330/340), a pilot should be go-minded. While I can't comment on Emirates policy for rejected takeoffs on their A330/340, here's another carrier's policy for the A330:

Quote:
Between 100kt and V1, reject only for:
ENGINE FIRE
APU FIRE
ENG FAIL
ENG OIL LO PRES
ENG REV UNLOCKED (reverser unlocked)
CONFIG Warning
SIDESTICK FAULT
L+R ELV FAULT (elevator fault)
Severe damage
Tyre failure below v1-20kt

Continue if visibility lost
Andrew, the Airbuses don't actually have a TOGA switch. A derate is deleted by moving the throttle levers from the FLX/MCT detent (takeoff setting when using a derate) to the TOGA position. Pushing TO/GA to remove a derate doesn't work on the B744 either. It can only be used to remove a derate after lift-off and before the reference thrust limit changes to climb.

Last edited by Ken K; 23rd April 2009 at 03:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement