#21
|
|||
|
|||
VA51 (ZK-PBK) landed around 10 minutes at CBR.
__________________
Flown: AIB: 320 (200), 321 (200), 330 (200,300), 340 (200), 380 (800) ATR: 72 (500) BOE: 717 (200), 737 (300,400,700,800), 747 (400), 767 (300), 777 (300), 787 (8,9) DHC: DH3, DH4 EMB: E70, E90 FKR: F100 SWR: SW4 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Oliver!
VA504 OOL-SYD (VH-ZPQ) also ended up in CBR, as did VA803 MEL-SYD (not sure on the acft operating) Last edited by Rowan McKeever; 28th May 2013 at 11:10 AM. Reason: New info |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
YIJ diverted, PBK was medical, both should be on the way soon
__________________
Recent Flights: 29/3/24 QF1509 (YQS) 29/3/24 QF1404 (LQF) 29/3/24 QF2078 (TQH) 29/3/24 QF945 (VXA) 17/3/24 QF1268 (X4A) 17/3/24 QF1267 (X4A) 1/3/24 QF1274 (X4A) 1/3/24 QF1269 (X4B) |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry, VUA was 803 not YIJ
__________________
Recent Flights: 29/3/24 QF1509 (YQS) 29/3/24 QF1404 (LQF) 29/3/24 QF2078 (TQH) 29/3/24 QF945 (VXA) 17/3/24 QF1268 (X4A) 17/3/24 QF1267 (X4A) 1/3/24 QF1274 (X4A) 1/3/24 QF1269 (X4B) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
I have QF 108,22,50 Both UA,NZ101,NZ845,VA2,VS200,BA15 and CX 111 plus a JQ domestic DRW-SYD diveryting to BNE but there may have been more ???
So 12 diversions to BNE. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe Sydneys 2nd airport won't get fog bound.
Not within the Sydney Basin. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Installation of touchdown zone lighting at both ends of 16R/34L and high intensity approach lighting on the 34L end will begin soon. That should hopefully lower the number of diversions when it's completed.
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Finally
Thanks Nigel.
So does this mean some lights in the water? Todd.
__________________
“When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it.” Henry Ford. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Having successfully handling a handful of diversions the Canberra media has been blowing the Capitals trumpet as a realistic option as Sydney's second airport. Cheers M
__________________
http://flightdiary.net/MarkG |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It won't be the full 900m long approach lighting system like at the 16R end and I understand there'll be an elevated platform/s extending from the top of the existing ground out to about where the rocks meet the water. I'd imagine having poles in the water would cause all sorts of grief for maintenance and general boat navigation in the area, especially during fog! How's the Ninja? Cheers Nigel
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-) |
|
|