Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th October 2009, 09:17 PM
Pete B. Pete B. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
Default Jetstar birdstrike on 26 Oct - fact or fiction?

My family and I were booked on JQ204 from Auckland to Sydney at 1550 on Monday 26 Oct. Whilst waiting to check-in, Jetstar uniformed personnel advised that the flight was cancelled due to a birdstrike seriously damaging a Jetstar aircraft. We were told to ensure minimal disruption across the network our flight was subsequently cancelled. We were told that as luck would have it Qantas had heaps of seats on their services at 1540 and 1830 so no one would be left behind.

This worked out rather well as we flew on the new 738 ZK-ZQC with all the bells and whistles and QFF points for a dirt-cheap JQ fare. It was fantastic but that's another story.

Since returning home I have tried valiantly to find any report of this supposed birdstrike and am left wondering if it was made up and that Jetstar cancelled for other more financial reasons...

Can anyone add some light to this for me..?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29th October 2009, 09:47 AM
Chris Roope Chris Roope is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew View Post
[FONT="Arial"]The fact that you would believe the service would be cancelled (keep in mind two sectors) due to some 'financial reason', defies belief...[FONT]
Why is that so hard to believe?
Assuming all the JQ pax on the return sector could also be accomodated on the QF flights then it would make perfect financial sense to send 2 full planes instead of 3 empty ones.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29th October 2009, 11:33 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

^ Yeah, I thought it was a legitimate question as well. What's with the put-down?


If it was indeed a bird strike, how is it verified other than a poster on this thread saying...

Quote:
The aircraft suffered a bird strike that rendered it unserviceable for the day
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29th October 2009, 12:48 PM
Phil S Phil S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
Default

Which port did the birdstrike occur at and what was the damage?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29th October 2009, 03:52 PM
James K James K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 90
Default

Goodness me! So does JQ actually pay QF for those multitudes of pax they FIM to QF?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29th October 2009, 04:00 PM
Nathan Bartlett Nathan Bartlett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 59
Default

By the looks of it the aircraft was VH-VQD and looks like it happened in Queenstown arriving from Christchurch. The Aircraft didn't depart Queenstown until the next day as JQ278 to Auckland. So a birdstrike looks very possible.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29th October 2009, 11:00 PM
D Chan D Chan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 463
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete B. View Post
Since returning home I have tried valiantly to find any report of this supposed birdstrike and am left wondering if it was made up and that Jetstar cancelled for other more financial reasons...
Many birdstrikes occur on a day to day basis than what is reported in the media, so it would not be surprising that you could not find a report. If you visit the ATSB website they do have weekly summary reports (with 3 weeks lag). Depending on where the bird hits it is indeed possible to render the aircraft u/s for more than a day if it was ingested into the engine.

As stated in previous posts deliberately canning a flight to reaccomodate pax to mainline would have impacts on JQ's operations, e.g. aircraft rotations and perhaps crew patterns. Base on this line of reasoning i don't see how they could have saved money by canning the flight. One has to also consider whether the carrier deliberately lies to its customers, again this is highly unlikely given the risks involved in deliberate misleading customers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30th October 2009, 11:44 AM
Pete B. Pete B. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks for the replies, even the heated ones.

Just to clarify, I have no reason not to believe Jetstar personnel. I just find it odd that the event didn't find it's way to any sensational-story-hungry media and also managed to slip past members of this board. You lot don't normally miss much, it almost defies belief!

Nathan, thanks for your info.

Last edited by Pete B.; 30th October 2009 at 11:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement