#1
|
|||
|
|||
AF A380 hits smaller Delta
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Just noticed this on smh.com.au, thats a bit of a woopsy!
Cheers M |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Would there be much damage from that. I ssume yes, to both aircraft...
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Ladies and gentlemen...the French apron coordinator decided we were on the wrong bay and thought they'd reposition us to enable a faster departure time. Oh....did I mention to fasten your seatbelts?"
__________________
I am always hungry for a DoG Steak! :-) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
BUGGER
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Gives a new meaning to fast turnaround, doesn't it
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The 380 wasn't exactly taxiing slowly.
__________________
Regards, Fred |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
And the NTSB says
Just issued:
Quote:
__________________
Philip |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I also noticed this, it seemed to be scooting along at quite a pace which is odd for a heavily congested airport like JFK. How could the crew be so blissfully unaware of the taxiway infringement (ie: the CRJ) considering they had a clear line of sight and also taxi cameras on board the aircraft?
That said I have no doubt that the incident will prompt some anti A380 sentiment within the US. Wait for the headline "Super Jumbo to big for JFK". Hopefully the USA can afford to fund the investigation into this incident, they are a little short of money at the moment
__________________
Whatever happened to Ti Dak? |
|
|