Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2nd August 2008, 04:27 AM
Gerald A Gerald A is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 537
Default Arabian knights challenge Kangaroo route

Quote:

Steve Creedy | August 01, 2008

MIDDLE Eastern carriers this week dealt another blow to the traditional Kangaroo route -- flying between Europe and Australia via hubs in Asia -- with announcements of big jumps in services to Melbourne and Brisbane.
Link http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...-23349,00.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 2nd August 2008, 04:43 AM
Gerald A Gerald A is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 537
Default

Etihad Airways has 4 A340s on order.

A340-500
A6-EHI 929
A6-EHJ 933

A340-600
A6-AHK 1030
A6-EHL 1038
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd August 2008, 10:30 AM
Michael Mak Michael Mak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 453
Default

Would Ethid get a replacement for the A340-600 that was written off at the Airbus factory earlier this year?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd August 2008, 02:38 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Mak View Post
Would Ethid get a replacement for the A340-600 that was written off at the Airbus factory earlier this year?
Considering (i think) it was still with airbus, and before delivery, i would think it would be replaced?

Quote:

As for "recycling", if it is considered a "total loss", the airframe will be paid for by Airbus' insurance co at the insured value, the insurance co will then auction off the wreckage. Airbus will properbaly not use any part of it for another new aircraft, since they are not authorized to use any "used" parts per their manufacturing authority. Totaled engines will be treated the same as the airframe, damaged engines will get a full tear down, any parts found damaged during detail inspection will be paid for by RR's insurance, to a total limit of 1/2 of the catalog price of the complete engine (typical for Airline insurance), then a total loss will be declared, very likly most of the inspected engine parts will be reinstroduced into the spares market via third party. The cabin furnishing provided (seats, galleys, and IFE system, purchased by Eithad and installed on the aircraft) is approximately $10M, Airbus' insurance company will not consider that as a loss and either sue Etihad to take them back or Airbus may take the responsibility, selling them as an used surplus package and buy all new equipment to be install on the replacement airframe.
from here http://www.nycaviation.com/forum/vie...t=9161&start=0

but i think that is more a guess than what is really going to happen, although i cant imagine Etihad having to wear the cost!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd August 2008, 03:42 PM
Andrew McLaughlin's Avatar
Andrew McLaughlin Andrew McLaughlin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhys Xanthis View Post
Considering (i think) it was still with airbus, and before delivery, i would think it would be replaced?

but i think that is more a guess than what is really going to happen, although i cant imagine Etihad having to wear the cost!
In other words...
__________________
Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net! http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=30538
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2nd August 2008, 07:02 PM
Grant Smith Grant Smith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere between YSSY & LLBG - God's Country
Posts: 774
Default

Macca,

In gambling terms, it's called hedging your bets
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd August 2008, 07:15 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grant Smith View Post
Macca,

In gambling terms, it's called hedging your bets
Well i would call it im almost sure it would be replaced by airbus, but nothing is sure
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 2nd August 2008, 07:29 PM
Grant Smith Grant Smith is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere between YSSY & LLBG - God's Country
Posts: 774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhys Xanthis View Post
Well i would call it im almost sure it would be replaced by airbus, but nothing is sure
And by that you mean you have no idea...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 2nd August 2008, 07:37 PM
Montague S's Avatar
Montague S Montague S is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 957
Default

Quote:
In gambling terms, it's called hedging your bets
never bet on black...
__________________
photos updated 29 Sept

Next Flights:
MEL-HKG-HND-HKG-JFK-HKG-NRT-HKG-MEL/CX
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 3rd August 2008, 12:02 AM
Philip Argy's Avatar
Philip Argy Philip Argy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North Strathfield
Posts: 1,402
Default All is not what it seems ...

Seven of the ten people that were on that aircraft during the engine run up testing incident were employees of Abu Dhabi Aircraft Technologies, a contractor that does final testing for Etihad. Be careful before you assume that Airbus has responsibility for what happened.
__________________
Philip
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement