Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 6th July 2012, 09:03 AM
Steve S... 2 Steve S... 2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 616
Default

The article states that all 737-700's will be gone by the end of 2013.

VH-VBU & VH-VBV will both turn 10 before the end of 2013.

I presume the year 2005 built VH-VBY & VH-VBZ will be withdrawn before 10 years and not in 2015?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 9th July 2012, 10:45 AM
Anthony T Anthony T is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Stalybridge Station Buffet
Posts: 321
Default

How are customer codes going to be allocated to the 737MAX?
Will Virgin get 737-MFE & QANTAS (if they order them) get 737-M38?

Just wondering
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 9th July 2012, 04:33 PM
Radi K Radi K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 787
Default

Unrelated to the order by VA has delayed the delivery of some of its Boeing 737NG aircraft until after 2016.

Still 31 new B737s due by 2016
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 9th July 2012, 04:40 PM
Radi K Radi K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 787
Default

A few higher res shots too.



Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 9th July 2012, 05:50 PM
Brock Little's Avatar
Brock Little Brock Little is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 484
Default

Looking good
__________________
Photos

JetPhotos.net (1381 Photos)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 15th July 2012, 11:38 AM
Richard H. Richard H. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 26
Default

Nice one.

I must admit to being a little surprised that Virgin haven't gone for any 737-900ER or Max-9 series aircraft.
Currently Jetstar can scale up to A321 and Qantas can go even further with their 763s on busy east coast or wherever routes where more capacity than a 738 or A320 is needed.
Perhaps Virgin will be relying on larger numbers of A330s for this sort of thing?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15th July 2012, 12:42 PM
Paul f. Paul f. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 324
Default

I thought the 737-900 would have been a better choice for Virgin than the A330s,the 330s a to big for our domestic market.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 15th July 2012, 08:05 PM
Rob R Rob R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 316
Default

A few years back the-900's were looked at but they found the turn around times would be longer due to more passengers and the same number exits and performance issues (stopping) on some of the shorter runways within the network, hence limiting their use.

If the company had of stayed or narrow body and low cost (sorry new world carrier) then they may have purchased the -900 for the golden triangle route, but now the A330 is here the need is no longer there. In time more A330's ( or perhaps 787's) will appear and operate on the golden triangle route.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 16th July 2012, 08:21 AM
Rowan McKeever Rowan McKeever is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,653
Default

Isn't DJ a little more about frequency than the capacity of each service on the golden triangle etc? Would've thought that would fit with the model of doing 'leisure' flying through the day (ie AYQ, SYD-ROK, SYD-MKY, SYD-TSV, etc)?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 16th July 2012, 02:25 PM
Will H Will H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 199
Default

The bigger problem with the -900ER and A321 is cost and residual values.

A and B attach a premium to their larger models, knowing that airlines can recoup the investment. There are differing views on seat costs for 900 v 800 and A321 v A320.

With the A320 and 737-800 being the most popular and versatile models, lessors like them and the models have good residual values, important if you're a carrier like VA swapping out your fleet every 7-10 years rather than, e.g. Delta or United that will acquire -900ERs and keep them more or less for life.

On paper the -900 and A321 should be more popular, but in practice other problems compound.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement