Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21st July 2010, 09:20 PM
Oliver Gigacz Oliver Gigacz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 678
Default Qantas orders Seven More Q400s

Qantas has ordered seven more Q400s. More to come...
__________________
Flown:
AIB: 320 (200), 321 (200), 330 (200,300), 340 (200), 380 (800)
ATR: 72 (500)
BOE: 717 (200), 737 (300,400,700,800), 747 (400), 767 (300), 777 (300), 787 (8,9)
DHC: DH3, DH4
EMB: E70, E90
FKR: F100
SWR: SW4
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21st July 2010, 10:48 PM
Peter JB Peter JB is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 71
Default

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bom...k=MW_news_stmp

I like Alan Joyce's comment "These new aircraft are next-generation Q400 aircraft with upgraded cabin interiors and larger overhead compartments."

Good move as I find the existing overhead compartments are quite annoying because I can't stow my mini-case in them very easily - takes a fair bit of grunt to get them to go in.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22nd July 2010, 01:45 PM
Kelvin R Kelvin R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 167
Default

As a frequent customer of the Q400 all I can say is that you can put lipstick on a pig but it's still a pig. I would love to know which customers QF are asking about these aircraft as personally I think they are no better than the Q200 or Q300 in terms of comfort and no where near the comfort of the E-Jets.

Specifically, you have to sit sideways if in the window seat due to the fuselage. The seats are not high enough or wide enough, have no recline and no wrap headrest. There are no window shades. There is no entertainment apart from watching the FA try and do cabin service on a short CBR-SYD flight in bumpy weather, often due to low loads the first 8 rows are blocked forcing PAX to squeeze in down the back, when the plane is full there is 1 bathroom which makes BNE to MKY an interesting flight and finally due to the galley size you cannot get a decent meal.

How is that an improvement in PAX comfort over a 737 which the Q400 more often than not has been replacing?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22nd July 2010, 07:16 PM
Gareth U Gareth U is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 199
Default

Qantas chooses not to order all the above amenity, Kelvin. The only one I believe is not available is adjustable headrests. Wet galley and ovens are available, as are window shades and better seats with recline.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22nd July 2010, 08:20 PM
Mick F Mick F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NSW
Posts: 852
Default

I don't care what anyone says, it's still a Dash 8. Give me a jet anyday.

Mick
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd July 2010, 10:09 AM
Max C Max C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 676
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvin R View Post
As a frequent customer of the Q400 all I can say is that you can put lipstick on a pig but it's still a pig.

They tried that... it's called -QOH!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23rd July 2010, 02:06 PM
Ash W Ash W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,053
Default

True Gareth, but they are still foul aircraft to fly in, for all the reasons Kelvin mentioned. Like him I wonder who Qantas consulted to come up with the conclusion that they are well like by customers?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23rd July 2010, 02:39 PM
Max C Max C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 676
Default

They're an Accountant's dream, so sadly nothing else matters.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23rd July 2010, 10:47 PM
Zac M's Avatar
Zac M Zac M is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,399
Default

I have to disagree with most of you. If you ask me, the Dash 8 Q400 is an awesome aircraft. I find it to be very comfortable, there is plenty of leg room (I am over 6ft tall) and I find the seat wide enough. The angle of climb is comfortable, and it tends to handle turbulence very well.

For flights like CBR-SYD it is an ideal aircraft, it can operate at lower altitudes and can have a quicker turn around time.
__________________
Recent Flights:
18/8/24 QF1286 (X4C)
18/8/24 QF7886 (A2T)
18/8/24 QF995 (VYC)
18/8/24 QF1508 (YQS)
4/8/24 QF1459 (QOH)
4/8/24 QF1508 (YQY)
27/6/24 QF1907 (UYU)
27/6/24 QF2170 (LQL)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23rd July 2010, 11:19 PM
Maikha Ly Maikha Ly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 500
Default

I like the Q400s as well, and can't see or experience what's so bad about them.

However, at the end of the day.... I'll fly in whatever gets given on the flight. I'm not really concerned to be picky over what aircraft I'd fly on if it wasn't the Canberra Airport Open day.
__________________
Wings and Wheels Photography - On Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/maikhaly/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement