Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 19th February 2014, 10:23 AM
NathanJ NathanJ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Somewhere on earth
Posts: 310
Default

Could this development be why the current government are stalling on the badgery's creek decision again?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 19th February 2014, 04:11 PM
Justin L Justin L is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 757
Default

Looking forward to following the progress of the changes. Used all three terminals at SYD during a recent visit back to Australia for the first time in two years and after the absence noticed the following changes:

T1: While the renovations are an improvement, it solidifies the terminal as shopping mall first, airport second.

T2: Liked the extension to the Virgin T2 pier with the international connection lounge, but the international terminal transfer bus was the T-Bus that went back on the external airport roads and Qantas Drive and subject to Sydney traffic. Why not have it like QF have (had?) from T3 with an airside transfer bus, or how Ansett also had the airside bus to T1 from T2?

T3: Still a nice terminal and I like that Qantas Link is now all in T3 with the mainline flights. But the terminal signage has all different fonts and sizes covering old lettering and looks messy and unprofessional. And the A380 mock over the travelator is really tacky! Also, the destination screens above the gates in the round rotunda gate area are really small and you can't read the destination without being right up at the podium.
__________________
ABQ ABX ACV ADD ADL AKL ALB AMA AMS ANC ARN ATH ATL AUA AUH AUS AVL AVV AZA BCN BDL BFL BGO BGR BHD BHM BHQ BIL BIS BKI BKK BLD BLI BLV BNA BNE BOG BOI BOJ BOS BSB BTR BUF BUD BUR BWI BZE BZN CAI CBR CGK CHC CHS CLE CLT CMH CNS CNX COS CPH CPT CTG CTS CUE CUN CUZ CVG CXF CZM DAL DBO DCA DEN DFW DLH DOH DRW DSM DTW DUD DUR DXB ECP ELP EUG EWR EYW EZE FAI FAR FAT FCA FCO FLG FLL FNL FNT FRA FRS FSD FU'K FWA GCN GDL GDN GEG GGW GIG GJT GOT GRI GRR GRU GSP GTF GUA GVA GYE HAM HAN HBA HBE HEL HHH HKD HKG HLZ HND HNL HOU HRL HSV HVB IAD IAH ICN ICT IDA IND INV ISP IST ITM ITO JAB JAX JFK JNB JNU JOG JTR KEF KGC KIX KMI KMJ KMQ KOA KRK KTN KUL LAS LAX LBB LBE LEJ LFT LGA LGB LHR LIH LIM LIN LIT LRD LST MAD MAF MAO MCI MCO MCT MCY MDE MDT MDW MEL MEM MEX MFE MFR MHU MIA MID MKE MNL MOB MOT MQL MRY MSN MSP MSY MTJ MTY MUC MVD MXP MZT NAN NAS NRT NTL OAG OAK OGG OKA OKC OMA OME ONT OOL ORD OSL OTZ OUI PAE PBG PDX PEK PER PHL PHX PIA PIT PLO PLZ PNH PSC PSG PSP PTY PVD PVG PVR PVU RAP RDD RDM RDU REC REP RIC RIX RNO ROC RSW SAL SAN SAT SAV SBA SBD SBN SBP SCK SCL SDF SDU SEA SFO SGF SGN SGU SHA SHV SIN SIT SJC SJD SJO SJU SLC SMF SMX SNA SOF SSA STL STS SUN SYD SYO SYR TIJ TLL TMW TPA TPE TSV TUL TUS TWF TYS VAR VIE VNO VPS WAW WDH WGA WLG WRG WVB XIY XNA YEG YHM YHZ YKM YOW YQB YQG YQM YTZ YUL YUM YVR YWG YXE YYC YYJ YYT YYZ ZRH

Next Trips:
11-12MAY LAS-DEN/CYS-DEN-LAS UA
18-19MAY LAS-DFW-BRO/HOU-LAS AA/WN
25-27MAY LAS-GEG/MSO-LAS WN/G4
31MAY-03JUN LAS-JFK-LAS DL/B6
08-09JUN LAS-PDX-LAS AS
21-24JUN LAS-GJT-LAS G4
04-08JUL LAS-SEA-ANC-ADQ-ANC-SEA-LAS AS
03-04AUG LAS-SAN-LAS F9/DL
17-18AUG LAS-SEA-KTN-SEA-LAS AS
29AUG-03SEP LAS-MSP-TVC-DFW-LAS SY/AA
28-29SEP LAS-DEN-LAS UA
08-11NOV LAS-EWR/BTV-ORD-LAS UA
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 20th February 2014, 07:56 PM
Matthew Chisholm Matthew Chisholm is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YORG
Posts: 169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan Lumsden View Post
Could this development be why the current government are stalling on the badgery's creek decision again?
No, they are consulting with the Liberal MP's whos seats are in and around the area to further consult with their electorate before making a final decision.
__________________
Matt Chisholm
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 21st February 2014, 06:36 AM
NathanJ NathanJ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Somewhere on earth
Posts: 310
Default

Sounds like trouble! We shall soon see...
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 28th February 2014, 07:19 PM
Eddy B Eddy B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1
Default

With the increasing size of aircraft and a 4km extra angled take off runway it may be possible to eliminate the need for a second airport within the Sydney basin.
As contractors generally cover their risk with high quotes it may be cheaper for the federal government to buy two TBM to drive the subways from KSA to Parrahub with the state government paying for the rest and using the 6mt excavated to build the extra runway.
Because KSA would benefit from this they could pay for a launch box 50m below sea level in competent stone eventually fitted with a bank of big lifts.
If the tradeoff was more jobs for Mascot and a five minute subway to Parramatta then residents around Botany may accept another runway being built in their harbour.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 15th April 2014, 01:59 PM
Kurt A Kurt A is offline
YSSY Forum Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: YSSY
Posts: 958
Default

Statement on secondary airport

Quote:
The Australian Government has today announced the decision to select Badgerys Creek as the location for Sydney’s secondary airport.

As outlined in today’s announcement by the Australian Government, significant infrastructure works need to be undertaken on and around the site for the proposed secondary airport.

It is important that a secondary airport be developed as demand requires, with priority placed on planning supporting infrastructure including roads, rail, public transport options, aviation fuel pipelines and utilities.

Extensive local community and stakeholder consultation will be a vital part of that process.

Sydney Airport has a Right of First Refusal which sets out a detailed process that will be worked through as and when appropriate. In the meantime, we will continue to engage in constructive discussions with the federal government.

In the interests of the travelling public, airlines and our shareholders, Sydney Airport will apply appropriate commercial and financial discipline throughout any process.

Sydney Airport’s approved Master Plan 2033 shows that we can meet forecast demand of 74 million passengers in 2033. Together with government, stakeholders, airline partners and the community, we are focused on improving the customer experience, increasing efficiency and enhancing capacity at Sydney Airport.
Contact:
Laura Stevens SACL
__________________
YSSY Forum Administrator
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement