Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10th June 2008, 08:01 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

Yeh they should just do it properly. Keep the BBJ's for domestic, A332/333/787 for international visits.

However, leasing a QF plane wouldn't be *all* that bad, although i expect QF would rather have the planes to themselves...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10th June 2008, 08:50 PM
damien b damien b is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Default

The BBJ and 604's are leased from Qantas i believe, and serviced by Qantas Defence Services Special Purpose Aircraft Business Unit which really manages the fleet for the RAAF.

If another aircraft was to be operated, logically as already mentioned either the A330 or another suitable QF operated aircraft would be the ideal candidate.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10th June 2008, 11:16 PM
Bob C Bob C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 687
Default

Surely you can't be serious Kent.

The QF B747-300s are dreadfully unreliable at present and have given untold grief to thousands of long suffering passengers to and from Perth for over 12 months. Hardly a day goes by without lengthy delays or cancellations.

On Monday my wife was returning to Perth from Sydney and the 747 due to fly QF575 went unserviceable. Luckily QF was able to substitute an A330-300which was arriving from Shanghai so she finally got away after a 2 hour delay. This follows a 90 minute delay on the PER-SYD leg last Monday week.

And friends of ours who travelled to Melbourne a few weeks ago endured 3 and 4 hour delays on both legs.

There are countless other incidents that could be mentioned also.

The B747-300s must be nearing the end of their lives and will be replaced later in the year. They're probably only good for scrap and parts now and I think QF will be glad to see the end of them.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10th June 2008, 11:17 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby C View Post
I think QF will be glad to see the end of them.
The delays are frustrating, especially for us in Perth who fly on them

They will be most glad to see the back of them, especially considering the current fuel prices. Im not sure the RAAF/G'ment would want them with fuel prices the way even! (not taking into account their lives are nearing end).

I just wonder if politics could get in the way of a decision...most likely will.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11th June 2008, 05:48 AM
Bob C Bob C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 687
Default

What are you saying Rhys - that clapped out, unreliable ex QF B747-300s will be foisted on to the RAAF who will then use them as VIP aircraft to fly the PM and others overseas ?

I very much doubt that the Government would do that to itself - it might as well shoot itself in the foot !

If it did happen, I'd change allegiance and barrack for the Dockers instead of the Demons !!!!

And to be perfectly honest, I'm at the point where I would avoid booking a 747 flight and would rather go via Adelaide to the Eastern states or pick a flight that had other equipment or use Virgin.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11th June 2008, 08:31 AM
Kent Broadhead Kent Broadhead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dulwich Hill
Posts: 555
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby C View Post
Surely you can't be serious Kent.
Hence the big grin at the end of the statement.....

Kent

PS. Mind you, where did the 707s come from?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11th June 2008, 09:24 AM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby C View Post
What are you saying Rhys - that clapped out, unreliable ex QF B747-300s will be foisted on to the RAAF who will then use them as VIP aircraft to fly the PM and others overseas ?

I very much doubt that the Government would do that to itself - it might as well shoot itself in the foot !

If it did happen, I'd change allegiance and barrack for the Dockers instead of the Demons !!!!

And to be perfectly honest, I'm at the point where I would avoid booking a 747 flight and would rather go via Adelaide to the Eastern states or pick a flight that had other equipment or use Virgin.
no, i said they wont take them.

and im the same...i just cant avoid flying on the 747's though..
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11th June 2008, 02:38 PM
Bob C Bob C is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 687
Default

"......I just wonder if politics could get in the way of a decision...most likely will...."

I read that sentence as meaning that if the B743s were offered then the Government would pressure the RAAF to take them (God knows why !)

The B743s must all be around the 60/80,000 hours mark and the domestic schedules would have greatly increased their expected number of cycles. Even more reason for the Government to not even think about them.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11th June 2008, 02:58 PM
Rhys Xanthis Rhys Xanthis is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby C View Post
"......I just wonder if politics could get in the way of a decision...most likely will...."

I read that sentence as meaning that if the B743s were offered then the Government would pressure the RAAF to take them (God knows why !)

The B743s must all be around the 60/80,000 hours mark and the domestic schedules would have greatly increased their expected number of cycles. Even more reason for the Government to not even think about them.
okay, i meant that politics would get in the way of purchasing a new aircraft for government use.

i do NOT think the ogvernemnt should purchase ex-qf 743...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11th June 2008, 08:37 PM
damien b damien b is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kent Broadhead View Post
Hence the big grin at the end of the statement.....

Kent

PS. Mind you, where did the 707s come from?
Qantas and Saudia Arabia - and in pretty good condition as well as they were relatively young and replaced by 747's in both cases i believe.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement