Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Technical > Flying and Technical Discussion
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th March 2010, 04:00 PM
Geoff W Geoff W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 178
Default Air safety report lists 70 malfunctions

How much of this story is really serious or just spin?

It seems a lot in some 60ish days, but I am sure there is another side to the story

I would appreciate your thoughts.

Kind regards,

Geoff



http://www.theage.com.au/travel/trav...0307-pqql.html

Last edited by Geoff W; 8th March 2010 at 04:01 PM. Reason: Cant spell again!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8th March 2010, 05:47 PM
Adam P. Adam P. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On two wheels
Posts: 570
Default

Sounds like someone's given a journo a copy of Flight Safety, and it's been taken just a little bit out of context.

Despite the best preventative maintenance, aeroplanes are complex mechanical beasts. Occasionally they break down. It's a fact of life. When they break, the defect gets reported. The industry tends to share information on service difficulties between operators of the same type in the interests of safety.

Then it gets fixed and the aeroplane goes and flies on the line again. All perfectly normal, everyday stuff for any airline.

Most of the time the general public will not hear about breakdowns - because aircraft can be swapped around (and frequently are - reason # 233 why rego requests are largely a waste of time, but that's another thread entirely ) behind the scenes so that they don't affect any schedules. It's only when those broken aeroplanes can't be swapped out to allow time to fix them (or the breakdown occurs in a particularly inconvenient location and there's a wait while engineers are positioned out there) that delays and disruptions result. You might hear about those occasionally (especially, dare I say it, if there's a big white kangaroo on the tail), but it's hardly a sign of safety problems.

But it's better to be reading about busted aeroplanes than to be reading about big, smoking, aeroplane-shaped holes in the ground, eh??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8th March 2010, 07:31 PM
Robert Zweck Robert Zweck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 383
Default

Whilst aeroplanes continue to be designed and constructed by humans, mechanical and other faults will continue to occur
__________________
As hopeless as a Twin Comanche on one engine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8th March 2010, 07:59 PM
Adam P. Adam P. is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: On two wheels
Posts: 570
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by me
Sounds like someone's given a journo a copy of Flight Safety, and it's been taken just a little bit out of context.
So I just got home and checked my mailbox.

Surprise! The new Flight Safety came out today.

Coincidence??
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement