Sydney Airport Message Board Sydney Airport Message Board  

Go Back   Sydney Airport Message Board > Aviation Industry News and Discussion > Australia and New Zealand Industry
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31st December 2010, 02:27 PM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

I'm not convinced. Borghetti claims to be a new-age carrier but his actions indicate anything but. It sounds to me like DJ is regressing into just another airline doing more of what other Airlines do. The fleet type increases, alliances and business class activities seems like it's more and more like Qantas and co.

What happened to that youthful go-getter, start up Airline from a few years ago? It this what it means to survive or make money in 2011 and beyond?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31st December 2010, 04:34 PM
Hugh Jarse Hugh Jarse is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 217
Cool

I think you'll find that "New World Airline" was a Godfreyism, not from Borghetti. He appears to have avoided that idea completely and gone a little more "mainstream" in his company direction.

I've dealt with him before in a previous airline life, and am happy to have him at the helm in my current. He is a man of action, doesn't suffer fools, and is a fair boss. Qantas' loss, actually

Quite the opposite to what they have on their management "team" over at the sheltered workshop that is Qantas.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd January 2011, 10:12 AM
D Chan D Chan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 463
Default

I still think the A330 will add further complexities to their operations (737s, Ejets, 777s and soon A330s), though going mainstream is a good move. I think the partnerships with Etihad is an interim strategy to make better use of the 77W (instead of being flown to Phuket or Jo'burg) for the time being until they figure out where they want to expand/grow internationally in the next 5 years (the big question mark is where in Asia). This role/challenge will keep JB busy for at least the next 3 years if not more.
JB is also very well connected and will use his influence to his advantage, the Etihad/Air New Zealand/Delta strategies are great examples. It's a good case of befriending your competitor's competitors.

The best way of figuring how well they do in 2011 and beyond is to look at their share price.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 7th January 2011, 07:28 AM
Mike W's Avatar
Mike W Mike W is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pymble, NSW
Posts: 746
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh Jarse View Post
I think you'll find that "New World Airline" was a Godfreyism, not from Borghetti. He appears to have avoided that idea completely and gone a little more "mainstream" in his company direction.

I've dealt with him before in a previous airline life, and am happy to have him at the helm in my current. He is a man of action, doesn't suffer fools, and is a fair boss. Qantas' loss, actually

Quite the opposite to what they have on their management "team" over at the sheltered workshop that is Qantas.
Thanks Mate. I hear you, yet despite your optimism, I'll wait and see how he goes. Really, I've enjoyed their fun 'no problem' approach since they stated. I'd hate to see them lose that and become a Qantas clone or worse.... Ansett.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10th January 2011, 10:12 AM
Andrew M Andrew M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 854
Default

I am not sure what forum I read this on .... but someone hinted that Virgin Blue was going to get Turbo Props...

Now they are!!!

ASX Link

Virgin Blue and Skywest - 10 year partnership - 18 new Turboprops!

http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/2011011...df1l79dkrn.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10th January 2011, 10:22 AM
Mark B Mark B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 73
Default

Any idea what the specific aircraft they are planning on using. The release doesn't give much away!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10th January 2011, 10:37 AM
Ryan M Ryan M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Perth
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark B View Post
Any idea what the specific aircraft they are planning on using.
Lots of rumors around point the ATR-72 being the aircraft. I'd believe it when I see it though.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10th January 2011, 08:55 PM
D Chan D Chan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 463
Default

that's a fairly smart arrangement - it's similar to the US/canada style regional airline outsourcing arrangements. As to the props it probably comes down to ATR72 vs Dash 8-400s?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10th January 2011, 11:32 PM
Radi K Radi K is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 787
Default

why you would get rid of the E170s and replace them with ATRs/Q400s is counterproductive I suggest .. just my thoughts..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11th January 2011, 12:23 AM
Rob R Rob R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 316
Default

Why, the 170's and for that matter any jet will not make money on routes less than 200- 250 miles. Plus flight times over such short routes are within 5-10 mins of a jet while burning a lot less fuel whist carrying the same number of passengers.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright © Sydney Airport Message Board 1997-2022
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Conditions of Use and Privacy Statement